Writing FInal

People who watch a lot of violent television programs will find that this influences their behavior when they are angry or upset

It is certainly true that in the modern age, popular media such as television has a tremendous effect on the society. The impacts of the violent television programs on the people is relatively understandable. I strongly agree that what one watch directly influences their way of behave.

There is no doubt that when the people watch any action movie or serial, they concentrate on that completely. The impression of such scenes are very strong that even after finishing the program, one might remember every detail of what he/she have watched. This phenomenon directly affect the human mind. When things go wrong, people associate their uncertainty with recent television series they might have watched. Unfortunately, many modern homes are faced situations where bad behavior become reason of quarrel.

To exemplify the above, every age group faces the immense difficulties due to violent action programs. In adults, differences between husband and wife relationships, disrespect towards children has one common cause, and that is horrible action scenes and its worse effect on domestic relationships

However, it is generally accepted that the television is a main source of information regarding current news, science and Knowledge. Nevertheless, the dreadful impact on the people's behavior is a fact, which no one deny.

In conclusion, it is clear from above contention that violent television programs effect all age groups. According to my perspective, one should minimize the amount of time he/she watches such horrible programs. it will assist them to eradicate the bad influence on their behavior.

Some workplaces do not ensure the safety of workers who use dangerous equipment. What can be done?

Some people say that smoking should be permitted in places where people gather to eat drink. Others find the smell of cigarette smoke offensive and want smoking banned in public.

What are the features of an ideal television show for children  below age?

How can society reduce the problems that people with disabilities suffer.

Smoking is a bad habit. Do you agree or disagree?

            smoking is a dangerous bad habit.it contains nicotine.it causes different diseases and damages our brain and lungs.most of the people are addicted it by someone ,specially our teenagers are affect by their friends.every year the number of people are death for this reason and sometimes they are avoided their family,which really shock-able.

            smoking has a lot of disadvantage .it causes different diseases such as cancer of different part of the body and brain stoke which makes para lashed our body.first of fall someone addicted by others and after some days they become chain smoker which really unthinkable.our young generation are involved day by day but they do not know about the effect of smoking.they couldn't understand how many diseases and naturally they fall in death.

            from the religious point of view it is prohibited .it is clearly shown our holy Quran ,if someone waste their valuable body parts with out excuse than they will be destroy in future.
it harmful not only smoker but also non smoker, if someone smoke infornt of their family member than each member get nicotine by smoke.that harms both side

            on the other hand it has no advantage but some one think that it gives relaxation and our young stars think that it becomes smart .

So i think that smoking is a really harmful to mankind and it waste our valuable life and valuable many thing like property and so many on.so everyone should conscious about the bad effect of smoking and our government should try to increase awareness .
lastly i would like to say if we want to get good health and wealth than we should avoid it

In the last century, the first man to walk on the moon said it was "a giant leap for mankind”. However, some people think it has made little difference to our daily lives.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

For this question, I would write that "I partly agree" or that "I agree to some extent". Then I would write one main paragraph about each side of the argument:

1. Introduction: I partly agree. Make it clear that you have a balanced opinion.

2. One side: In practical terms, sending a man to the moon has not changed most people's lives. We have not benefited in terms of our standard of living, health etc. In fact, governments have wasted a lot of money that could have been spent on public services.

3. Other side: On the other hand, putting a man on the moon was a huge achievement that still inspires and interests people today. It showed us that we can achieve anything we put our minds to.

4. Conclusion: The fact that man has walked on the moon might not have had a direct effect on our daily lives, but it was an inspiring achievement.

Some vegetarians say it selfish and unnecessary for people to eat meat in a world where food resources are becoming increasingly scarce.

According to some vegetarian groups, eating animal meat is cruel, selfish and unnecessary especially in the world where food resources are limited. I strongly disagreed with the argument due to the following reasons.

            First of all, although there are studies and research regarding the benefits of consuming vegetarian diets, there is also evident that human benefit more by consuming animal meat than eating vegetarian foods. For instance, one serve of steak contains three times more iron and protein than a serve of potato bake. Thus, having meat in one’s diet is an act of self caring rather than self indulging.

            Secondly, the natural disasters, like flood and drought are affecting the food supply in the whole world. Therefore, the increasing scarcity of food resources affects not only the supply of meats but also fruits and vegetables. If eating meat is a selfish act, consuming fruits and vegetables should also be seen as an unfavorable action.

            Thirdly, some vegetarians claim that eating meat is an act of cruelty because it involves the act of killing living animals. However, they forget that fruits and vegetables are also living things.

Lastly, the scarcity of food supply has nothing to do with meat eating. It is mainly due to people's greed and their food wastage. People often purchase and store more food than they can consume. This worsening situation is the culprit of the inadequate food supply.

            To conclude, I believe that eating meat should not be considered as a selfish or cruel act. It is only a matter of eating style and preferences. You would agree that we need a balance diet with both meat and vegetables. Nevertheless, individuals must also be responsible for their own choice and do not waste any food resources. So there will always be enough food for all the people in the world.

Smoking in public places should be banned, what is your viewpoint, do you agree or disagree.

Ban on smoking in places is not only justified but also imperative. Many countries are realizing the dangers of passive smoking and are coming up with measures to curb the problems popping up with the passive smoking.

Medical science has fully supported the dangers of potential passive smoking. To illustrate my point I will like to cite the fact that most of the people die due to cigarette smoking which contains nicotine. Inveterate smokers pack up themselves with lung and oral cancer rather than from natural causes. Government is squandering astronomical sums for the treatment of pulmonary cancers and  educating the populace from the dangers of smoking .The imposition of high taxes on nicotine based products has already been done to restrain this habit.

The debatable point is that to what extent these steps have been succeeded to dissuade the smokers. Cigarette smoking not only pollutes the air but also make non-smokers inhale the stale smoke imperiling their health too. Ingrained smokers are not destroying their own health but also of others. The main critical issue in this respect is that is anyone (child or adult) safe from passive smoking. The doom of asthmatics, pregnant women can we well imagined too.

Some smokers argue that banning smoking in public places is direct impingement of their human rights but this line is futile because right to smoking is not absolute, but right to life is. Many persons unintentionally take up smoking by watching others; thereby unleash the smoke in public places. This is what they call fashion.

Thus it is imperative to impose appropriate laws as it will not only prevent non-smokers from falling victim to the dangers of passive smoking, but also directly benefit the diehard smokers who would then have no choice but to curtail their smoking habit.